Talk:Side Stories/@comment-24.0.10.193-20130424060252/@comment-5912204-20130427204325

24.0.10.193, your whole post is a straw man arguement. you keep going on and on about movie authors that have nothing to do with what anyone here was talking about. what does the fact that trial and error improve your work have anything to do with the successes of specific movie authors? we criticize movie authors because they choose to publicly release films for profit, and people pay to see them. side stories on the other hand are just for other people to enjoy.

secondly, nobody said you couldn't criticize someone's work. there's nothing in the rules or guidelines against that, and criticism is always inevitable. however, we discourage pure criticism, and that's why i said before that constructive criticism is always welcome. i don't see a single drop of constructive criticism in your posts, even though you said yourself that " you should happy that there are people who are willing to point out the flaws in it, because that means that your next one won't suck as bad". i hope you don't really think that nonconstructive criticism is the best way to better one's work, because that would be completely false.

as i said before, you are entitled to your own opinion, but if you don't like a side story posted, either don't play it or post some constructive criticism to help better it. offer to fix grammar and name spelling if it really bothers you, etc etc. don't forget that this wiki is a community. i'm sure nobody wishes to pursue this debate any longer, so i'll end it with this.