Talk:Alice/@comment-2037710-20130711084449/@comment-4878757-20130711230752

In all fairness though, imagine the wiki as a book. The information is put into relevant sections that make it readable and with minimum repetition, if a page in a book does something that another page does, why have that page in the first place?

I'm really not here to argue definitons or slam proverbial fists on the desk, just refining the layout of the wiki. It's better to distribute the information in a way that it can be read rather than just what a heading says. Headings are easy to change and the information in this biography could be applied to so many other pages, why have all the information on one page with lots of stubs around it when that information can be spread around those pages to bulk up those stubs.

People might come to this page to read about Alice, but I don't think they want to see that much at once. Think of it as condensing what we have and suggesting further reading for in depth points.