Talk:Goddess Ilias/@comment-26228098-20151031013705/@comment-25707465-20151031094209

Well, one plan to avoid a global war by creating rules to keep her subject on the defensive, while the other is raising heroes to antagonize relations further while trying to kill the first and her subject. The first is barely holding her subjects together due to the fact that she only recently but has a powerful and sane loyal court that has more or less the same goal as her (namely living in peace), while the other has an army of fanatics and closely surrounded herself with a trio of typical evil villains aka a mad scientist, a downright insane monster lord (which also make her an hypocrite by the way) and a totally fanatic angel crazed with her.

While the former came to the idea that should her plan fail, she should sacrifice herself, the other comes to the conclusion that since not everybody follower her, she should do a MASSIVE GENOCIDE THAT ALSO INCLUDE HER HUMAN FOLLOWERS to recreate an ideal world, aka one where she is the epicenter of everything. That's not exactly a godess I would follow.

Sooo, no. Ascending in heaven is not a better ending than seeing your dream come to life in front of your very eyes, where you live in world where human, monsters and even some angels manage to coexist. Ilias and Alice are both an obstacle for each other, but one has a sliiightly more sane and altruistic goal than the other.

tl;dr Ilias's ego is the problem.