User blog comment:ClickWhirr/Against Censorship/@comment-4878757-20130401180642/@comment-4878757-20130401185054

There is also the danger of coming across as if the point of the art is to just court controversy rather than getting a point across. As an artist you have to think "What is my art trying to say? Who is the intended audience? What do I need in the art to communicate that effectively? What do I need to exclude to make the communication effective?"

If your intended message is purely to say "fuck your rules" then people ignore that because it's overdone and predictable. Fact is anyone can photograph or draw a cock or tits if they do what they want, but then what does that art mean? I had to do a topless job once and I felt nothing from it, the images were just nothing, just a girl with her tits out. I pushed the boundaries out because I "wanted to" but in the end the result meant nothing.

I guess my case is everyone has a level of some sort, if you look at Fenoxo of CoC he'll let you grow a horsecock, get raped in the ass, have worms invade your uthera, infect people, rape and all sorts. But he doesn't touch loli, he is disgusted by it, that doesn't make him a puritan, just an individual.