Talk:Alice I/@comment-5299683-20131029192123/@comment-10534118-20131030040351

Even though Alice I was more experienced, it's likely that's only because her offshoots and monsters were based more off animals and plantsof the Earth itself. Whilst Ilias made Angels from within her realm alone. So it's likely animal instincts kick in with monsters. Meaning dietary changes to some monsters or high desire to produce offspring. A Beezlebub is a fully grown queen fly who's supposed to be Egg-laying repeatedly. While the Dragon-girls (Making me think Dragonkin inherited more human traits and less carinvorous ways of feeding off humans) eventually saw Humans as just another piece of meat on the buffet list. Voracious monsters see humans as the diet they need with alittle boost from our semen. So naturally they desire that more and more leading to us being prey more often.

Alice I may or may not have coexistance in mind but it's likely not all of the first humans used for breeding were willing. Ok very likely, like 90%+. But it's also likely she wasn't experienced in keeping all of her creations in control. Opposite of Ilias who had full organizational setups, educational ways, role-oriented angels for specific means, and full 100% loyalty except for a few exceptions. It really shows another equal-yet-opposite trait about the two. Ilias though inexperienced with her own creations had much more control, where Alice I had more experience but could've had less control. The number are also proof of this. Ilias has tons of Angels but compared to the sheer number of monsters and both her and Alice I's rate of creations, it clearly shows a number difference.

So point to Ilias in creation organization and control. Until Lucifina's rebellion, Mikela's leaving, and another, adorkable case that's a Spoiler, Angels definitely excelled in being under Ilias' control compared to Alice I and her monsters. Even Seraph Eden though easily angered and not 100% reliable is still eternally loyal.